In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 13 Mrz., 20:13, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> 1 > 2 1 > 3 2 1 > ...
> > > > > The set of even naturals do not fit in one such finite line > > > It seems that there are only finite lines. And never two or more lines > contain more than one of them. This is simply fact.
Any two lines contain more that the first of them. > > > if we note > > that given any even natural, there is another larger than it. And for > > every even number that WM claims is a last/largest one, others can find > > another yet later/larger. > > But in actual infinity the set is complete.
But not cut off.
> That means that we cannot > find further naturals.
Since we already have for any one another which is further, we do not need anything more 'further' than we already have.
> All is in te list and, by construction, never > in more than one line.
The next line is always more that any one line can be. --