Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology § 253
Replies: 30   Last Post: Apr 22, 2013 2:44 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Virgil

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 253
Posted: Apr 18, 2013 3:41 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article
<cfce34c4-2051-41a3-aedf-ece8e90d044b@y2g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

"As far as the laws of mathematics refer to
reality, they are not certain; and as
far as they are certain, they do not refer
to reality. It seems to me that complete
clearness as to this state of things first
became common property through that new departure
in mathematics which is known by the name of
mathematical logic or ŒAxiomatics.¹ The progress
achieved by axiomatics consists in its having
neatly separated the logical-formal from its
objective or intuitive content; according to
axiomatics the logical-formal alone forms the
subject-matter of mathematics, which is not
concerned with the intuitive or other content
associated with the logical-formal. . . .
[On this view it is clear that] mathematics
as such cannot predicate anything about
perceptual objects or real objects. In
axiomatic geometry the words Œpoint,¹ Œstraight
line,¹ etc., stand only for empty
conceptual schemata."

Albert Einstein
--





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.