On 18 Apr., 09:26, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > In article > <4ab7c57a-19d2-4302-b030-8552e90c4...@f18g2000vbs.googlegroups.com>, > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > On 18 Apr., 08:19, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > > > > WM cannot be an ultrafinitist and > > > expect others to not hold him to > > > task for it. > > > There is a third way: potential infinity. > > If there is a form of consistent mathematics using only potential > infiniteness, WM has yet to find it,
Cauchy, Gauss, Weierstraß, Kronecker, Poincaré, Brouwer have left a lot of writings about that system. No need to re-invent it. Read it!