On 18 Apr., 22:09, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > No. The algorithm exists. But it will never yield a complete infinite > > decimal string equal to 1/9. Every index of a 1 of that string that > > you can name, imagine, or think is finite. > > It is not the size of any one index but the number of different indices > that is not finite.
The number of indices is a number. Up to any finite index it is a finite number.
> > > Obviously it is the > > greatest you can name > > Why even try to name what does not exist, a greatest member.
Try to name the greatest number that you can name. Or try to name a greater number than all you have known.