
Re: Chapt15.54 Maxwell Eq deriving Darwin Evolution & Superdeterminism #1303 New Physics #1506 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Posted:
Apr 19, 2013 3:52 PM


On Friday, April 19, 2013 12:39:38 PM UTC7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > On Apr 18, 1:56 am, Archimedes Plutonium > > <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote: > > (snipped)
I'm curious: if everyone here in sci.math posted offtopic, the site would become useless for all. Now, many, if not most of us, choose not to post offtopic for that reason. Is there a good reason why the rules should not apply to you? I mean, why do _we_ have to use discipline, but you do not have to? Do you believe you are better than others?
> > > > > > GENERALIZED MAXWELL EQUATIONS: > > > > > > 1) Euclidean Geometry = summation of Elliptic Geometry plus Hyperbolic > > > Geometry > > > > > > 2) Ellipses of Elliptic geometry strive or are determined to become > > > circles of Euclidean Geometry. > > > > > > > Alright, I made a mistake there, I am pretty sure of that, because the > > evidence of science would have no reduction of the 4 Maxwell Equations > > into 2 Maxwell Equations. And rather, there maybe an expansion of the > > Equations into 6 Maxwell Equations. > > > > Now the evidence for this is that if I were to generalize to 2 Maxwell > > Equations, then the Dirac Equation is not obtained as a 4 matrix > > vector. Another evidence is that the fundamental particles are at > > least proton, electron, photon, neutrino. For if the Maxwell Equations > > can be reduced to a generalized 2 Equations, then we would have to > > have physics built out of just 2 fundamental particles, such as the > > photon and neutrino and the proton and electron composite particles. > > > > So I admit my mistake here and am pushing forward to see if the 4 > > Maxwell Equations derives the Darwin theory of Evolution and the Bell > > Inequality theory of Superdeterminism. I believe the Maxwell Equations > > easily derives those. > > > >  > > Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google > > newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I > > call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now > > is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio, > > sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro, > > sci.physics.electromag to?be hosted by a University the same as what > > Drexel?University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to > > be in education?not in the hands of corporations chasing after the > > next dollar bill. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, > > simple and fair author archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012 > > as seen here : > > > > http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986 > > > > Archimedes Plutonium > > http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium > > whole entire Universe is just one big atom > > where dots of the electrondotcloud are galaxies

