Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology § 253
Replies: 30   Last Post: Apr 22, 2013 2:44 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 253
Posted: Apr 19, 2013 3:57 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 19 Apr., 12:05, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> > On 4/19/2013 3:41 AM, WM wrote:
> >
> >

> > >> If numbers existed only as names then different names would necessarily
> > >> represent different numbers,

> >
> > > No. Look, the unicorn does not exist other than as its name. But there
> > > are different written names and many different pictures describing it.

> >
> > So, you now turn to an argument about negative existential
> > statements.

> No, I only explained that Virgil's argument was mistaken. There can be
> many names for an idea that has no material counterpart.

> >
> > How do you justify your analysis of the
> > statement
> >
> > "The unicorn does not exist"

> Why should I? The unicorn exists in several forms as ideas of many,
> contrary to individuals that cannot even exist as ideas.

There are those to whom the idea that every individual natural must have
a successor, and a double, and all sorts of other but larger individual
naturals firmly exists, and that the notion of a largest natural is as
stupid as WM.
> Regards, WM


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2015. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.