The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 253
Replies: 30   Last Post: Apr 22, 2013 2:44 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 1,968
Registered: 12/4/12
Re: Matheology § 253
Posted: Apr 19, 2013 5:12 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 4/19/2013 3:50 PM, Virgil wrote:
> On 4/19/2013 9:16 AM, WM wrote:
>> On 19 Apr., 14:28, fom <> wrote:

>>>> If numbers existed only as names then different names would
>>>> necessarily represent different numbers,

>>> Those are called negative existential statements.

>> No, those are called nonsense.

> How is it nonsense to say that different names are not the same name?
> And how is it nonsense to say that if numbers are no more than names
> that different ones are different?
> Here is todays example of WM's logic

>> There exist m, n, a b in |N,
>> such that m is in FISON(a) and not in FISON(b) and n is in FISON(b)
>> and not in FISON(a).

> For each natural n in |N, FISON(n) is defined by WM to be the set of all
> naturals less than or equal to the natural number n.
> Thus for natural numbers m ands n,
> n is in FISON(m) if and only if n <= m, and
> similarly n is NOT in FISON(m) if and only if m < n.
> Thus if m is in FISON(a) and not in FISON(b), then b < m <= a
> and if n is in FISON(b) and not in FISON(a), then a < n <= b
> Thus in WM's world one must have b < a and a < b simultaneously.

Yeah. First I did it quick.

It got worse when I tried it carefully!!!

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.