Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Chapt15.54 generalization of the Maxwell Eq and deriving Darwin
Evolution #1301 New Physics #1504 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Replies: 8   Last Post: Apr 21, 2013 5:16 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com

Posts: 9,926
Registered: 3/31/08
resolving magnetic monopole with dipole Chapt15.55 the 5th Maxwell
Equation #1306 New Physics #1509 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Posted: Apr 20, 2013 3:43 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Marvelous how a good night's sleep helps solve a physics and math
problem. The problem was, as you may well remember is that magnetic
monopoles are attraction only, and that magnetic dipoles are both
attraction and repulsion the same as electric charge.
So I need to have the Maxwell Equations have the feature of magnetic
monopoles attract only, and never repel.

These are the 4 Maxwell Equations with magnetic monopoles and the
Dirac Equation.

div*E = r_E

div*B = r_B

- curlxE = dB + J_B

curlxB = dE + J_E
?________________

div*E + div*B + (-1)curlxE + curlxB = r_E + r_B + dB + dE + J_E + J_B

Now Wikipedia has a good description of how Dirac derived his famous
equation which gives this:

(Ad_x + Bd_y + Cd_z + (i/c)Dd_t - mc/h) p = 0

And we can see that by summation of the Maxwell Equations we derive
the Dirac Equation.

Let me modify my terms so that the wave function as p is denoted as
f_w(p).

(Ad_x + Bd_y + Cd_z + (i/c)Dd_t - mc/h) f_w(p) = 0

Now I think the solution is going to have to be a 5th Maxwell Equation
that recognizes magnetic dipoles and magnetic monopoles where the
monopoles are attract only, yet the dipoles like electric charge are
both attract and repel. I am guided by the Dirac Equation, which may
turn out to be an error on my part, but I instinctively would assume
that Dirac, looking blindly for a relativistic Schrodinger Equation,
would stumble upon, not a complex equation but a equation of most
primitive form. So I am going to assume Dirac would have found a most
primitive relativistic Schrodinger Equation, not a polished one.

The Dirac Equation has 5 terms in all. That is asymmetrical, but it
would not be asymmetrical if it had 6 terms in all. And the Maxwell
Equations have an asymmetry of the negative sign in Faraday's law. So
in my sleep and rest, I found the most easiest solution and way out of
this problem. We have a 5th Maxwell Equation of -div*M = 0. This
equation is similar to the no magnetic monopole equation of Gauss's
law of magnetism except it has M for monopole instead of B for dipole.
And it has a negative sign that allows attraction force only and no
repulsion.

div*E = r_E

div*B = r_B

- div*M = 0

- curlxE = dB + J_B

curlxB = dE + J_E

And now we modify the Dirac Equation with a total of 6 terms rather
than 5 terms:

(Ad_x + Bd_y + Cd_z + (i/c)Dd_t - mc/h - (div*M)) f_w(p) = 0

Now let us look back and reflect on this. There are asymmetries still,
but we should not look bad or harsh on asymmetry because the Universe
is growing and in growing we need asymmetry. Mind you, most asymmetry
means a mistake is made, but we need some asymmetry when it is the
Universe in question. The reason that pi or "e" are not rational is
because the Universe is growing and not standing still. So asymmetry
is needed if an object is growing.

--
Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to?be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel?University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education?not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent,
simple and fair author-archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012
as seen here :

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies


Date Subject Author
4/18/13
Read Chapt15.54 generalization of the Maxwell Eq and deriving Darwin
Evolution #1301 New Physics #1504 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/18/13
Read Darwin Evolution derived by generalized Maxwell Equations Chapt15.54
generalization of the Maxwell Eq and deriving Darwin Evolution #1302 New
Physics #1505 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/19/13
Read Chapt15.54 Maxwell Eq deriving Darwin Evolution & Superdeterminism
#1303 New Physics #1506 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/19/13
Read Re: Chapt15.54 Maxwell Eq deriving Darwin Evolution &
Superdeterminism #1303 New Physics #1506 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
gk@gmail.com
4/20/13
Read does CurlxB need to be negative signed? Chapt15.54 Maxwell Eq
deriving Darwin Evolution & Superdeterminism #1304 New Physics #1507 ATOM
TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/20/13
Read does the magnetic current density make for attraction-only?
Chapt15.54 Maxwell Eq deriving Darwin Evolution & Superdeterminism #1305 New
Physics #1508 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/20/13
Read resolving magnetic monopole with dipole Chapt15.55 the 5th Maxwell
Equation #1306 New Physics #1509 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/21/13
Read 5th new Maxwell Equation, - div*M = 0 , where 137/2(M) = 1(e)
Chapt15.55 #1307 New Physics #1510 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/21/13
Read fine-structure physical evidence for the 3rd Coulomb force - div*M =
E Chapt15.55 #1308 New Physics #1511 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.