
resolving magnetic monopole with dipole Chapt15.55 the 5th Maxwell Equation #1306 New Physics #1509 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Posted:
Apr 20, 2013 3:43 PM


Marvelous how a good night's sleep helps solve a physics and math problem. The problem was, as you may well remember is that magnetic monopoles are attraction only, and that magnetic dipoles are both attraction and repulsion the same as electric charge. So I need to have the Maxwell Equations have the feature of magnetic monopoles attract only, and never repel.
These are the 4 Maxwell Equations with magnetic monopoles and the Dirac Equation.
div*E = r_E
div*B = r_B
 curlxE = dB + J_B
curlxB = dE + J_E ?________________
div*E + div*B + (1)curlxE + curlxB = r_E + r_B + dB + dE + J_E + J_B
Now Wikipedia has a good description of how Dirac derived his famous equation which gives this:
(Ad_x + Bd_y + Cd_z + (i/c)Dd_t  mc/h) p = 0
And we can see that by summation of the Maxwell Equations we derive the Dirac Equation.
Let me modify my terms so that the wave function as p is denoted as f_w(p).
(Ad_x + Bd_y + Cd_z + (i/c)Dd_t  mc/h) f_w(p) = 0
Now I think the solution is going to have to be a 5th Maxwell Equation that recognizes magnetic dipoles and magnetic monopoles where the monopoles are attract only, yet the dipoles like electric charge are both attract and repel. I am guided by the Dirac Equation, which may turn out to be an error on my part, but I instinctively would assume that Dirac, looking blindly for a relativistic Schrodinger Equation, would stumble upon, not a complex equation but a equation of most primitive form. So I am going to assume Dirac would have found a most primitive relativistic Schrodinger Equation, not a polished one.
The Dirac Equation has 5 terms in all. That is asymmetrical, but it would not be asymmetrical if it had 6 terms in all. And the Maxwell Equations have an asymmetry of the negative sign in Faraday's law. So in my sleep and rest, I found the most easiest solution and way out of this problem. We have a 5th Maxwell Equation of div*M = 0. This equation is similar to the no magnetic monopole equation of Gauss's law of magnetism except it has M for monopole instead of B for dipole. And it has a negative sign that allows attraction force only and no repulsion.
div*E = r_E
div*B = r_B
 div*M = 0
 curlxE = dB + J_B
curlxB = dE + J_E
And now we modify the Dirac Equation with a total of 6 terms rather than 5 terms:
(Ad_x + Bd_y + Cd_z + (i/c)Dd_t  mc/h  (div*M)) f_w(p) = 0
Now let us look back and reflect on this. There are asymmetries still, but we should not look bad or harsh on asymmetry because the Universe is growing and in growing we need asymmetry. Mind you, most asymmetry means a mistake is made, but we need some asymmetry when it is the Universe in question. The reason that pi or "e" are not rational is because the Universe is growing and not standing still. So asymmetry is needed if an object is growing.
 Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio, sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro, sci.physics.electromag to?be hosted by a University the same as what Drexel?University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to be in education?not in the hands of corporations chasing after the next dollar bill. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair authorarchiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012 as seen here :
http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986
Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electrondotcloud are galaxies

