Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology § 255
Replies: 69   Last Post: Apr 24, 2013 9:49 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de

Posts: 16,051
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 255
Posted: Apr 20, 2013 5:44 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 20 Apr., 23:36, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> > > Thus for every s_i there is i+1 in |N not in s_i, but Union(S) = |N.
>
> > That is trivial and requires no explanation.
>
> > U s_i = |N.
>
> > But either there are all naturals in one s or not.
> > That is simple TND.

>
> And since for EVERY such s, max(s) + 1 is NOT a member of s, there
> cannot be all natruals in any s.


Then for all j: there is an n not in s_j.
Does the union contain more naturals than the complete sequence?

>
> > If *not* all naturals in one s, then
> > exist j, k, m, n : m e s_j & ~(m e s_k) & ~(n e s_j) & n e s_k.

>
> Once before claimed and also once beforE DEBUNKED.
>
> NOTE that a e s_b iff a <= b and ~( a e s_b) iff a > b, so that
>    m e s_j & ~(m e s_k) & ~(n e s_j) & n e s_k
> iff
>    (m <= j) & (m > k) & (n >j) & ( n <= k)
> But  if (m <= j)  & (n >j) then m < n
> And  if (m > k) & (n <= k) then  n < m
> So it follows that m > m and n > n, at least


if all naturals are in the terms s_i of S but not all are in one s_i.
Yes, that's the contradiction.

Otherwise there are more naturals in the union than in the terms of
the sequence. That would be another contradiction.

Regards, WM



Date Subject Author
4/20/13
Read Matheology § 255
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology � 255
David C. Ullrich
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
fom
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology � 255
Virgil
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
fom
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
fom
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
fom
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
fom
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
fom
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology � 255
Virgil
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology � 255
Virgil
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
fom
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
fom
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
fom
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology � 255
Virgil
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology � 255
Virgil
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology � 255
Virgil
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology � 255
Virgil
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
fom
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology � 255
Virgil
4/21/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/21/13
Read Re: Matheology � 255
Virgil
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
fom
4/20/13
Read Re: WMytheology Sucks
Virgil
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
fom
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
fom
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
fom
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
fom
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology � 255
Virgil
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
fom
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
fom
4/21/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/21/13
Read Re: Matheology � 255
Virgil
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology � 255
Virgil
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology � 255
Virgil
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
fom
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology � 255
Virgil
4/21/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/21/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
fom
4/21/13
Read Re: Matheology � 255
Virgil
4/22/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/22/13
Read Re: Matheology � 255
Virgil
4/23/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/23/13
Read Re: Matheology � 255
Virgil
4/24/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/24/13
Read Re: Matheology � 255
Virgil
4/24/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/24/13
Read Re: Matheology � 255
Virgil
4/24/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
fom
4/23/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
gus gassmann
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
fom
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
fom
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology § 255
fom
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology � 255
Virgil
4/20/13
Read Re: Matheology � 255
Virgil

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.