Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Chapt15.54 generalization of the Maxwell Eq and deriving Darwin
Evolution #1301 New Physics #1504 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Replies: 8   Last Post: Apr 21, 2013 5:16 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com

Posts: 9,280
Registered: 3/31/08
5th new Maxwell Equation, - div*M = 0 , where 137/2(M) = 1(e)
Chapt15.55 #1307 New Physics #1510 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Posted: Apr 21, 2013 1:02 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

These are the 5 Maxwell Equations:

- div*M = 0

div*E = r_E

div*B = r_B

- curlxE = dB + J_B

curlxB = dE + J_E

I spent the day pondering this, whether I made a mistake and how
sweepingly new this would be for
physics, since we have two types of magnetism. We have the magnetic
monopole M which composes Space in actuality, where Space equals
magnetic monopoles. And then we have magnetic dipoles such as
permanent bar magnets. But this need not be so strange, since in
electricity we have the electric field and we have the isolated
electric charge of a electron and we have the electric current of many
electrons in motion.

So before, we had the magnetic field, as a Space but we really had no
particle for magnetism. Now we do, the magnetic monopole.

And this need not be strange because, afterall, why did Dirac chase
after a magnetic monopole in the first place? He did so because he
knew that the magnetic monopole would quantize the electric charge.
Dirac saw that electric charge was quantized and so, now, he wanted
the magnetic monopole to exist and held responsible for why electric
charge was quantized.

Now the old Maxwell Equations had no magnetic monopoles and when we
write them with magnetic monopoles we end up with this:

div*E = r_E

div*B = r_B

- curlxE = dB + J_B

curlxB = dE + J_E

But those are not good enough because the magnetic monopole would have
both a attraction and repulsion. Rather instead, we need a law that
the magnetic monopole of like poles or unlike poles always attract.

And we need a law that quantizes the magnetic monopole with the unit
electric charge. Dirac found out that it must be a factor of 137/2 (e)
where e is the unit electric charge. I believe Dirac got the correct
factor, only he incorrectly reversed its power. I believe it takes
137/2 magnetic monopoles to equal 1 unit of electric charge.

So today I proposed this new Maxwell Equation law:

- div*M = 0

The M stands for magnetic monopole and the B in the Maxwell Equations
stands for magnetic dipoles. The negative sign allows only attraction
force between magnetic monopoles.
Now in this law, the magnetic monopole has a relationship of 137/2
with the electric charge and the magnetic monopole is always
attracting never repelling a second magnetic monopole.

So the complete set of Maxwell Equations would be five equations:

- div*M = 0 , where 137/2(M) = 1(e)

div*E = r_E

div*B = r_B

- curlxE = dB + J_B

curlxB = dE + J_E

I spent two days now trying to derive attraction only for magnetic
monopoles and the only sensible solution appears to be to have a 5th
Maxwell Equation. And because we need a quantization of monopoles with
electric charge, anyway, hence we need a 5th new equation.

--
Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to?be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel?University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education?not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent,
simple and fair author-archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012
as seen here :

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies


Date Subject Author
4/18/13
Read Chapt15.54 generalization of the Maxwell Eq and deriving Darwin
Evolution #1301 New Physics #1504 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/18/13
Read Darwin Evolution derived by generalized Maxwell Equations Chapt15.54
generalization of the Maxwell Eq and deriving Darwin Evolution #1302 New
Physics #1505 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/19/13
Read Chapt15.54 Maxwell Eq deriving Darwin Evolution & Superdeterminism
#1303 New Physics #1506 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/19/13
Read Re: Chapt15.54 Maxwell Eq deriving Darwin Evolution &
Superdeterminism #1303 New Physics #1506 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
gk@gmail.com
4/20/13
Read does CurlxB need to be negative signed? Chapt15.54 Maxwell Eq
deriving Darwin Evolution & Superdeterminism #1304 New Physics #1507 ATOM
TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/20/13
Read does the magnetic current density make for attraction-only?
Chapt15.54 Maxwell Eq deriving Darwin Evolution & Superdeterminism #1305 New
Physics #1508 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/20/13
Read resolving magnetic monopole with dipole Chapt15.55 the 5th Maxwell
Equation #1306 New Physics #1509 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/21/13
Read 5th new Maxwell Equation, - div*M = 0 , where 137/2(M) = 1(e)
Chapt15.55 #1307 New Physics #1510 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/21/13
Read fine-structure physical evidence for the 3rd Coulomb force - div*M =
E Chapt15.55 #1308 New Physics #1511 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.