Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology § 253
Replies: 30   Last Post: Apr 22, 2013 2:44 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de

Posts: 16,057
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 253
Posted: Apr 21, 2013 4:37 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 20 Apr., 22:12, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> > 1
> > 1, 2
> > 1, 2, 3
> > ...
> > contains all naturals, i.e., no one is missing, but that in no line
> > there are all naturals. That means, in no line all are together, which
> > are together in the union of all lines. Since when unioning, nothing
> > is added, that not has been previously in at least one of the lines,
> > the union must contain at least two numbers, call them m and n, which
> > were in the list, but not in the same line.

>
> Nonsense!
>
> Either m > n or n > m or m = n, but only one of these.
>
> So either m > n and both are in every line that m is in,
> or n > m and both are in every line that n is in,
> or both are in every line the either is in.


Yeah. You got it. But that implies that all numbers of the first
column are also in one and the same line. You could prove that even
geometrically, turning the lines by pi/2 and writing all into one and
the same column.

Regards, WM



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.