The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 253
Replies: 30   Last Post: Apr 22, 2013 2:44 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 18,076
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 253
Posted: Apr 21, 2013 4:37 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 20 Apr., 22:12, Virgil <> wrote:

> > 1
> > 1, 2
> > 1, 2, 3
> > ...
> > contains all naturals, i.e., no one is missing, but that in no line
> > there are all naturals. That means, in no line all are together, which
> > are together in the union of all lines. Since when unioning, nothing
> > is added, that not has been previously in at least one of the lines,
> > the union must contain at least two numbers, call them m and n, which
> > were in the list, but not in the same line.

> Nonsense!
> Either m > n or n > m or m = n, but only one of these.
> So either m > n and both are in every line that m is in,
> or n > m and both are in every line that n is in,
> or both are in every line the either is in.

Yeah. You got it. But that implies that all numbers of the first
column are also in one and the same line. You could prove that even
geometrically, turning the lines by pi/2 and writing all into one and
the same column.

Regards, WM

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.