In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 21 Apr., 12:22, netzweltler <reinhard_fisc...@arcor.de> wrote: > > On 21 Apr., 11:07, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 21 Apr., 10:02, netzweltler <reinhard_fisc...@arcor.de> wrote: > > > > > > On 20 Apr., 19:03, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > > > > > All atoms of the accessible universe and all positions they can take > > > > > belong to a finite set. > > > > > > How do we prove, that the number of possible positions an atom can > > > > take along a line of 1 cm is finite? > > > > > By accepting quantum mechanics and excluding theology (these > > > assumptions taken as axioms for those who believe (as an axiom) to > > > need axioms) a proof is given > > > here:http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0709/0709.4102.pdf > > > pages 2-3. > > > > > Regards, WM > > > > What about a position between two quanta? Should there be no decimal > > fraction for a position between two adjacent quanta along this line of > > 1 cm?- > > Quantum theory tells us, contrary to Einsteins's false beliefs, that > unmeasurable events do not exist. The electron or photon does not > simultaneously have fixed position and momentum (that would contradict > some results of interference experiments).
Does quantum theory actually say that a particle cannot have both a position and a momentum simultaneously HAVE, or does it merely say that we cannot accurately determine both its position and momemtum simultaneously? > > Mathematics, contrary to Einstein's false beliefs, is nothing but a > condensation of reality. This should answer your question.
Given a choice between following WM's WMytheology or following Einstein's worldview, I suggest one follow Einstein. > > Nobody can hinder you to believe in things that nobody can say, think, > identify, measure. But that is not science. It is theology or > superstition, or, in the worst case, matheology. I say "worst case" > because many naive people believe that matheology is a science run by > intelligent proponents.
Since WM declares that Einstein is one of those matheologists, the world is on their side in opposition to WM's WMytheology. --