Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Chapt15.54 generalization of the Maxwell Eq and deriving Darwin
Evolution #1301 New Physics #1504 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Replies: 8   Last Post: Apr 21, 2013 5:16 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com

Posts: 9,280
Registered: 3/31/08
fine-structure physical evidence for the 3rd Coulomb force - div*M =
E Chapt15.55 #1308 New Physics #1511 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Posted: Apr 21, 2013 5:16 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Now there is a slight change of this new law of the Maxwell Equations,
where yesterday I wrote it as:

-div*M = 0

and today I write it as a constant over 137/2 M = (e)
showing that 137/2 magnetic monopoles equals 1 unit of electric-charge
(e).

So the complete set of Maxwell Equations would be five equations:

- div*M = E

div*E = r_E

div*B = r_B

- curlxE = dB + J_B

curlxB = dE + J_E

Now is there any physical evidence for this new 5th Maxwell Equation
that quantizes the magnetic monopole and quantizes the magnetic dipole
and quantizes the electric charge and allows for only
a force of attraction (the need for a negative sign)?

Of course there is, because what the 5th equation does, and
incidentally I make it the first of the Maxwell Equations, is add a
3rd Coulomb law to the Maxwell Equations. The Maxwell Equations, thus,
ends up with 3 Coulomb laws, the Coulomb of electric charge, Gauss's
law of electricity, and the Coulomb of magnetic dipoles where Gauss's
law of magnetism has monopoles within the dipoles B, and finally in
the Coulomb law of magnetic monopoles, this new 5th equation.

If physics had just two Coulomb laws in the Maxwell Equations then the
formula of Balmer-Rydberg spectral lines formula would cover the topic
of spectral lines completely. But because there are Fine Structure
spectral lines, the Maxwell Equations require a 3rd Coulomb law.

Spectral line type of formula such as the Balmer-Rydberg
formula:

1/y = R(1/m^2 -(1/n^2))

The 1/m^2 is one Coulomb law and the 1/n^2 is the second Coulomb law.

But Spectral lines in physics does not end with just 2 Coulomb laws
for there are Fine Structure Spectral lines which require a 3rd
Coulomb law.

Now reading in Wikipedia about Fine Structure we see

H = H_0 + H_kinetic + H_so + H_Darwinian

Now let us not get confused with Charles Darwin of biology, for this
is a relative of Charles Darwin who became a physicist and involved in
spectral lines.
The H_so stands for spin-orbit coupling.
The fact that the H, hamiltonian requires three terms is indicative
that spectral lines require 3 Coulomb force laws.

So in a sense, the Maxwell Equations need a third Coulomb force of
magnetic monopoles to quantize electric charge and to create the Fine
Structure Constant and Fine Structure Spectral Lines of physics.

--

Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to?be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel?University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education?not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent,
simple and fair author- archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012
as seen here :

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies


Date Subject Author
4/18/13
Read Chapt15.54 generalization of the Maxwell Eq and deriving Darwin
Evolution #1301 New Physics #1504 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/18/13
Read Darwin Evolution derived by generalized Maxwell Equations Chapt15.54
generalization of the Maxwell Eq and deriving Darwin Evolution #1302 New
Physics #1505 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/19/13
Read Chapt15.54 Maxwell Eq deriving Darwin Evolution & Superdeterminism
#1303 New Physics #1506 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/19/13
Read Re: Chapt15.54 Maxwell Eq deriving Darwin Evolution &
Superdeterminism #1303 New Physics #1506 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
gk@gmail.com
4/20/13
Read does CurlxB need to be negative signed? Chapt15.54 Maxwell Eq
deriving Darwin Evolution & Superdeterminism #1304 New Physics #1507 ATOM
TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/20/13
Read does the magnetic current density make for attraction-only?
Chapt15.54 Maxwell Eq deriving Darwin Evolution & Superdeterminism #1305 New
Physics #1508 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/20/13
Read resolving magnetic monopole with dipole Chapt15.55 the 5th Maxwell
Equation #1306 New Physics #1509 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/21/13
Read 5th new Maxwell Equation, - div*M = 0 , where 137/2(M) = 1(e)
Chapt15.55 #1307 New Physics #1510 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/21/13
Read fine-structure physical evidence for the 3rd Coulomb force - div*M =
E Chapt15.55 #1308 New Physics #1511 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.