In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 21 Apr., 22:51, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > > Quantum theory tells us, contrary to Einsteins's false beliefs, that > > > unmeasurable events do not exist. The electron or photon does not > > > simultaneously have fixed position and momentum (that would contradict > > > some results of interference experiments). > > > > Does quantum theory actually say that a particle cannot have both a > > position and a momentum simultaneously HAVE, or does it merely say that > > we cannot accurately determine both its position and momemtum > > simultaneously? > > "Have" would be the correct answer. > > > > Given a choice between following WM's WMytheology or following > > Einstein's worldview, I suggest one follow Einstein. > > Typical case of belief in authority.
WRONG! It is merely a choice between whether to consider Einstein or WM a more reliable source of information.
And given the choice between accepting WM as a reliable source of information and accepting Einstein a reliable source of information, only WM would accept WM. > > > Since WM declares that Einstein is one of those matheologists. > > No, I never did.
Then WM must be accepting Einstein as a reliable source of information.
In which case:
"As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality."