On 22 Apr., 23:43, netzweltler <reinhard_fisc...@arcor.de> wrote:
> > If I am travelling to target T and I am as close as one shortest > possible wavelength w to target T, is this the same as reaching T in > reality? So, T - w = T?
How would you measure that? You have no sharp surface limit. You are a wave-packet. (And as long as you and the target exist, the shortest possible wave does not exist, because some energy is missing.)
> Or is w still a real distance to travel > (without having to travel halfway this distance, because halfway > doesn't exist)? > > Whatever wavelength w is, it must have the same properties as 0 has in > mathematics. Only for w = 0 it is valid, that T - w = T. > > > In reality there is not a d/2 for every d. > > Even in mathematics there is not a d/2 for every d. If d = 0.
Of course there is d/2, but is does not differ from d.