|
|
Re: Matheology § 246
Posted:
Apr 23, 2013 4:59 AM
|
|
On 22 Apr., 21:39, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> In article
> <d906f7e2-ee76-4621-b12a-9a093d2d6...@y2g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>,
>
> WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > On 22 Apr., 15:52, gus gassmann <g...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
> > > Just for the record, Mueckenheim: 2 is not "in" {(1), (1, 2), (1, 2, 3),
> > > ...} in the same way it is in {1, 2, 3, ...}.
>
> > I did not claim that it is *in the same way* inside.
>
> Your whole argument is based on it being "in the same way".
No at all! IThe question is only: Is, in mathematics, the number m of
natural numbers larger than every natural number?
If yes, are m numbers in the first column of
1
2, 1
3, 2, 1
...
?
Is there a line with m numbers?
If not, then the following is a logical necessity:
exist j, k, m, n : m e s_j & ~(m e s_k) & ~(n e s_j) & n e s_k.
No mention of sets at all.
Regards, WM
|
|
