|
Re: Matheology § 246
Posted:
Apr 23, 2013 4:59 AM
|
|
On 22 Apr., 21:39, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > In article > <d906f7e2-ee76-4621-b12a-9a093d2d6...@y2g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>, > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > On 22 Apr., 15:52, gus gassmann <g...@nospam.com> wrote: > > > > Just for the record, Mueckenheim: 2 is not "in" {(1), (1, 2), (1, 2, 3), > > > ...} in the same way it is in {1, 2, 3, ...}. > > > I did not claim that it is *in the same way* inside. > > Your whole argument is based on it being "in the same way".
No at all! IThe question is only: Is, in mathematics, the number m of natural numbers larger than every natural number? If yes, are m numbers in the first column of
1 2, 1 3, 2, 1 ... ? Is there a line with m numbers? If not, then the following is a logical necessity: exist j, k, m, n : m e s_j & ~(m e s_k) & ~(n e s_j) & n e s_k.
No mention of sets at all.
Regards, WM
|
|