In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 22 Apr., 21:03, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > > > Since WM declares that Einstein is one of those matheologists. > > > > > No, I never did.
Then why does WM object so strongly to Einstein's:
"As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality. It seems to me that complete clearness as to this state of things first became common property through that new departure in mathematics which is known by the name of mathematical logic or Axiomatics.¹ The progress achieved by axiomatics consists in its having neatly separated the logical-formal from its objective or intuitive content; according to axiomatics the logical-formal alone forms the subject-matter of mathematics, which is not concerned with the intuitive or other content associated with the logical-formal. . . . [On this view it is clear that] mathematics as such cannot predicate anything about perceptual objects or real objects. In axiomatic geometry the words point,¹ straight line,¹ etc., stand only for empty conceptual schemata."