On 23 Apr., 22:54, Ralf Bader <ba...@nefkom.net> wrote: > WM wrote: > > On 22 Apr., 19:08, Ralf Bader <ba...@nefkom.net> wrote: > > >> >> Mückenheim seems to think are quantifiers, as > >> >> a': E\lambda: \lambda is real > >> >> b': A\lambda: \lambda is real- > > >> > The former is declared as a correct math statement, the latter is > >> > declared as a false math statement. > >> > Too difficult for you to understand? > > >> The matter is that the garbage you composed is > >> no mathematical statement at all. > > > You are wrong. "exists a solution L of x^3 + 1 = 0 with the property L > > is real" is a mathematicial statement with the existence quantifier. > > Are you too stupid to see that this sentence does NOT result from resolving > your abbreviation?
Would you tell me (or at least the curious readers) what you find when "resolving" my abbreviation? Perhaps here we can easier figure out where you go astray, than in problems of infinity.
Kürzt man ?Lösung der Gleichung x^3 + 1 = 0? mit lambda ab, so lassen sich die Aussagen prägnant formulieren: E lambda: lambda ist reell. (w)
When we abbreviate "resolution of the equality x^3 + 1 = 0" by lambda, we can say E lambda, lamda is real. (true)