Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Replies: 10   Last Post: Apr 25, 2013 1:01 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Herman Rubin Posts: 399 Registered: 2/4/10
Posted: Apr 24, 2013 1:52 PM

On 2013-04-24, Dan <dan.ms.chaos@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 24, 5:38 pm, dullr...@sprynet.com wrote:
>> On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 02:19:43 -0700, William Elliot <ma...@panix.com>
>> wrote:

>> >Assume for f:[0,1] -> R that there's some c /= 0,1 with
>> >for all x in [0,1/2], f(x) = c.f(2x).

>> >Show there's some k with for all x in [0,1], f(x) = kx.

For one thing, the theorem is false. The most one can hope
to get is that f(x)=kx^q for some k and q>0. On the open
interval, q can even be negative.

>> Not true. It's well known that there exists a nowhere-
>> continuous function f : R -> R such that
>> f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y) for all x, y.

>> Maybe you omitted a hypothesis? Seems like it may be
>> true for continuous f...

One does not need to go that far. The general solution is
f(x)=x^q*h(log_2(x)), where h is any function. Continuous
does not get farther. However, all derivatives bounded
will get q to be a positive integer and h constant.

> Maybe if you restrict it such that f:[0,1] -> [0,1]?
> Just a hunch,not sure.

It can be seen from the above that this will not suffice.
Even requiring that f be 1-1 will not suffice to get more
than the general solution with limits on h, but not just
the multiple of a power.

--
This address is for information only. I do not claim that these views
are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University.
Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University
hrubin@stat.purdue.edu Phone: (765)494-6054 FAX: (765)494-0558

Date Subject Author
4/24/13 William Elliot
4/24/13 David C. Ullrich
4/24/13 dan.ms.chaos@gmail.com
4/24/13 Herman Rubin
4/24/13 David C. Ullrich
4/25/13 David Petry
4/25/13 Herman Rubin
4/25/13 dan.ms.chaos@gmail.com
4/24/13 David C. Ullrich
4/24/13 William Elliot
4/25/13 David C. Ullrich