On 24 Apr., 22:08, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > On 24 Apr., 21:35, netzweltler <reinhard_fisc...@arcor.de> wrote: > > > On 24 Apr., 13:49, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > > On 24 Apr., 08:20, netzweltler > > > > > If it is Planck length what is meant by shortest possible wavelength > > > > No. Planck mass, for instance, is certainly not the smallest possible > > > mass: 10^-8 kg. > > > > > Wikipedia says "... it would become impossible to determine the > > > > difference between two locations less than one Planck length apart."http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_length > > > > It doesn't read like there is no difference, it just cannot be > > > > determined. > > > > How should there be a difference if it cannot be determined, even in > > > priciple by reality itself? > > > What does "no difference" mean in this case? 0? Or an undefined > > difference between 0 and Planck length?- > > Same as "no fixed position and momentum".
"no fixed difference" but definitely between 0 and Planck length?