The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Onto [0,1]
Replies: 40   Last Post: Apr 29, 2013 10:16 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 12,067
Registered: 7/15/05
Re: Onto [0,1]
Posted: Apr 25, 2013 5:31 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

quasi wrote:
>William Elliot wrote:
>>baclesback wrote:
>>> More specifically, use the representation of x in C Cantor
>>> set in base 3 with only 0's and 2's in the expansion of 3,
>>> and map
>>> f: x=0.a1a2..... ---> 0.b1b2.......
>>> Wheref(bi)= 0 , if ai=0 , f(bi)=1 , if ai=2 .
>>> This f is continuous, but not absolutely continuous ( which
>>> preserves sets of measure zero. )

>>Why is f continuous?

>Because f is increasing.

I meant:

Because f is _strictly_ increasing.

>If X,Y are subsets of R, and f: X -> Y is a monotonic function,

I meant:

If X,Y are subsets of R, and f: X -> Y is a _strictly_ monotonic

>then f is continuous (with respect to the relative topologies on
>X and Y inherited from R).


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.