Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Onto [0,1]
Replies:
40
Last Post:
Apr 29, 2013 10:16 PM



quasi
Posts:
12,067
Registered:
7/15/05


Re: Onto [0,1]
Posted:
Apr 25, 2013 5:31 AM


quasi wrote: >William Elliot wrote: >>baclesback wrote: >>> >>> More specifically, use the representation of x in C Cantor >>> set in base 3 with only 0's and 2's in the expansion of 3, >>> and map >>> >>> f: x=0.a1a2..... > 0.b1b2....... >>> >>> Wheref(bi)= 0 , if ai=0 , f(bi)=1 , if ai=2 . >>> >>> This f is continuous, but not absolutely continuous ( which >>> preserves sets of measure zero. ) >> >>Why is f continuous? > >Because f is increasing.
I meant:
Because f is _strictly_ increasing.
>If X,Y are subsets of R, and f: X > Y is a monotonic function,
I meant:
If X,Y are subsets of R, and f: X > Y is a _strictly_ monotonic function,
>then f is continuous (with respect to the relative topologies on >X and Y inherited from R).
quasi



