Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Onto [0,1]
Replies: 40   Last Post: Apr 29, 2013 10:16 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 quasi Posts: 12,067 Registered: 7/15/05
Re: Onto [0,1]
Posted: Apr 25, 2013 11:09 PM

Butch Malahide wrote:
>Butch Malahide wrote:
>>quasi wrote:
>> >
>> > Prove or disprove:
>> >
>> > If X is a topological space and f: X -> [0,1] is a
>> > continuous surjection, then X has a subspace homeomorphic
>> > to the Cantor set.

>>
>> No, X could have the discrete topology.

>
>Here's a less trivial (because it's nonconstructive)
>counterexample. Let C be the Cantor set.
>Let c = |C| = 2^{aleph_0}. The product space CxC contains just
>c subsets homeomorphic to C; of course, each of those subsets
>has cardinality c. By transfinite induction, we can construct
>a subset X of CxC which meets each vertical line {x}xC (x in
>C) while containing no homeomorph of C. Of course there is a
>continuous surjection from X to C.

How do you ensure that X contains no homeomorph of C?

quasi

Date Subject Author
4/21/13 William Elliot
4/21/13 Butch Malahide
4/21/13 William Elliot
4/22/13 David C. Ullrich
4/22/13 Butch Malahide
4/22/13 David C. Ullrich
4/21/13 Bacle H
4/21/13 William Elliot
4/21/13 Bacle H
4/21/13 Bacle H
4/21/13 Butch Malahide
4/21/13 Bacle H
4/25/13 William Elliot
4/25/13 Butch Malahide
4/27/13 William Elliot
4/27/13 Butch Malahide
4/27/13 Butch Malahide
4/29/13 Butch Malahide
4/29/13 William Elliot
4/25/13 William Elliot
4/25/13 quasi
4/25/13 Butch Malahide
4/25/13 quasi
4/25/13 quasi
4/25/13 quasi
4/25/13 quasi
4/25/13 David C. Ullrich
4/21/13
4/25/13 quasi
4/25/13 quasi
4/25/13 quasi
4/25/13 Butch Malahide
4/25/13 quasi
4/25/13 Butch Malahide
4/25/13 Tanu R.
4/25/13 quasi
4/25/13 Butch Malahide
4/25/13 quasi
4/26/13 Butch Malahide
4/26/13 quasi