On 26/04/2013 05:14, 1treePetrifiedForestLane top-replied: > it wasn't published?... I found that > a couple of guys on this forum had found > a closed form, that I knew was good to "all known > (heuristically) digits," but had no construction; > I had found this, many years ago, > while I was perusing Ribenboim's _Prime Number Records_, > and it is a simple geometrical construction. > >>> Brun's constant is not transcendental >> >> proof?
Can you give a reference? or will you continue wittering?