Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum


Math Forum
 Ask Dr. Math
 Discussions
 Internet Newsletter
 MathTools
 Problems of the Week
 Teacher2Teacher
 Teacher Exchange
 Workshops

Search All of the Math Forum:
Browse our Internet Mathematics Library

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Interpreting ZFC
Replies: 14   Last Post: Apr 30, 2013 3:45 PM

Advanced Search
Reply to this Topic Reply to this Topic

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Zaljohar@gmail.com

Posts: 2,665
Registered: 6/29/07
Re: Interpreting ZFC
Posted: Apr 27, 2013 1:58 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Apr 27, 3:55 pm, Jan Burse <janbu...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> No
>
> Zuhair schrieb:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Pre-ZFC is a first order theory with the following axioms:
>
> > (1) Powerful Boundedness: if phi is a formula in which x,y are free,
> > then
> > all closures of:
>
> > EB: (Vy in B(Ex C A:phi)) & (Vx C A ((Ey:phi) ->(Ey in B:phi)))
>
> > are axioms.
>
> > C is subset relation.
> > V;E signifies universal; existential quantification respectively.
>
> > 2) Infinity.
>
> > /
>
> > The whole of ZFC can be interpreted in Pre-ZFC.
>
> > Zuhair

Hmmm,... you must have figured out some flaw somewhere, what is it?

Zuhair

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2013. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.