Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Interpreting ZFC
Replies: 14   Last Post: Apr 30, 2013 3:45 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Zaljohar@gmail.com

Posts: 2,665
Registered: 6/29/07
Re: Interpreting ZFC
Posted: Apr 27, 2013 1:58 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Apr 27, 3:55 pm, Jan Burse <janbu...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> No
>
> Zuhair schrieb:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> > Pre-ZFC is a first order theory with the following axioms:
>
> > (1) Powerful Boundedness: if phi is a formula in which x,y are free,
> > then
> > all closures of:

>
> > EB: (Vy in B(Ex C A:phi)) & (Vx C A ((Ey:phi) ->(Ey in B:phi)))
>
> > are axioms.
>
> > C is subset relation.
> > V;E signifies universal; existential quantification respectively.

>
> > 2) Infinity.
>
> > /
>
> > The whole of ZFC can be interpreted in Pre-ZFC.
>
> > Zuhair

Hmmm,... you must have figured out some flaw somewhere, what is it?

Zuhair



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.