Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
closed universe, flat space?
Replies:
48
Last Post:
May 5, 2013 2:45 PM




Re: closed universe, flat space?
Posted:
Apr 29, 2013 4:48 PM


"RichD" <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:8b41d76d051f4cc09c234acd51aea047@gh3g2000pbd.googlegroups.com... > On Apr 23, Nicolas Bonneel <nicolas.bonn...@wanadooooo.fr.invalid> > wrote: > > > Supposedly, our universe is closed and finite, although the > > > geometry and topology isn't precisely known. > > > This means a straight line (geodesic) traveler > > > must return to his starting > > > poiint, yes/no? Hence, curved space. > > > > no  a flat torus... is flat, closed and finite, > > and a traveler returns to his starting point. > > ? > I'm a lifetime donut connoisseur, but have > yet to see a flat one. > >
There are different uses of the term "flat". E.g. for a 2d surface flat could mean:
a) Flat when viewed in some higher dimensional space within which the surface is embedded.
or
b) Intrinsically flat, i.e. flat in terms of measurements purely within the surface.
The surface of a cylinder illustrates the difference: it is flat in the sense of (b), but not (a). Local measurements purely within the surface would not show any curvature  in fact we can imagine flattening out individual areas to look at (like flattening out a rolled up map), and it is only in the largescale topology of the space that we see it is distinguishable from an infinite plane.
The surface of a sphere, on the other hand is not flat in either sense. The nonflatness can be determined intrinsically, e.g. by looking at circles measured within the sphere surface, and comparing the circumference/radius ratio for the circles. As the circles get bigger we see growing deviations from the value of Pi which we would expect if the space were flat. (In the cylinder surface example, no such deviations emerge.)
Geodesics are an intrinsic property of the surface, and when people talk of "space being flat" they are using the sense (b) above. There is generally no suggestion (or any requirement) of the space being embedded in any higher dimension space...
Within a "cylinder" space, we may follow a geodesic path and return to the starting point, and yet the space is flat everywhere, which is what others have been explaining. A "donut" space is a "cylinder" space with a finite axis length, but with the ends of the cylinder "joined up" (identified), and as with an infinite cylinder space, the donut space is everywhere flat and unbounded. We could also call the donut space a closed space, although "compact" is a more accurate term.
Just to be clear, we are not considering these cylinder and donut spaces as being embedded in any higher dimension space here. We are considering just the surfaces themselves, along with their intrinsic measurement structures. Just as with 2d surfaces, 3d space and 4d spacetime have higher dimensional analogues, which are flat, and closed but unbounded. So the fact that geodesics "loop back" upon themselves does not imply the space is curved.
Regards, Mike.



