Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology § 259
Replies: 9   Last Post: May 2, 2013 4:46 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Virgil

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 259
Posted: May 1, 2013 3:43 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article
<bc374a9b-7b13-4a66-87f0-baa0d5994730@x14g2000vba.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> Matheology § 259
>
> A discussion in sci.logic yielded the following remarkable results
> with respect to a list having infinitely many lines
> {1}
> {1} U {2}
> {1} U {2} U {3}
> ...
> Each line contains as many unioned sets as its line number indicates
> but does not contain a line |N, since each line has a finite last
> number n.
>
> On the other hand, there are infinitely many lines and, as each line
> adds one number, there are infinitely many numbers in the list. Since,
> by construction, every finite initial segment s_n = {1, 2, 3, ..., n}
> is in one single line, all finite initial segments are in one single
> line.


While each FISON fills in one single line, that does not put any two
FISONs on the same line, and certainly does not, at least outside
Wolkenmuekenheim, put all lines in any one line.



> But |N is not more than all its finite initial segments.

Yes it is, as it is not merely a list of all its FISONs but the union of
all of them, which is not the same thing, except possibly in the wilds
of Wolkenmuekenheim, .
>
> Otherwise there must exist at least two finite initial segments such
> that
> exist j, k, m, n : m e s_j & ~(m e s_k) & ~(n e s_j) & n e s_k.


Certainly not outside his Wolkenmuekenheim. While WM keeps claiming itt,
he has yet to proffer any evidence for it, much less any proof of it.

Thus if it is to hold at all, it can only hold where WM's word is law
and his claims do not need proofs: inside Wolkenmuekenheim,
--





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.