Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology § 259
Replies: 9   Last Post: May 2, 2013 4:46 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Scott Berg

Posts: 1,796
Registered: 12/12/04
Re: Matheology � 259
Posted: May 1, 2013 9:06 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply


"Virgil" <virgil@ligriv.com> wrote in message
news:virgil-CC3CDD.13433101052013@BIGNEWS.USENETMONSTER.COM...
> In article
> <bc374a9b-7b13-4a66-87f0-baa0d5994730@x14g2000vba.googlegroups.com>,
> WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>

>> Matheology § 259
>>
>> A discussion in sci.logic yielded the following remarkable results
>> with respect to a list having infinitely many lines
>> {1}
>> {1} U {2}
>> {1} U {2} U {3}
>> ...
>> Each line contains as many unioned sets as its line number indicates
>> but does not contain a line |N, since each line has a finite last
>> number n.
>>
>> On the other hand, there are infinitely many lines and, as each line
>> adds one number, there are infinitely many numbers in the list. Since,
>> by construction, every finite initial segment s_n = {1, 2, 3, ..., n}
>> is in one single line, all finite initial segments are in one single
>> line.

>
> While each FISON fills in one single line, that does not put any two
> FISONs on the same line, and certainly does not, at least outside
> Wolkenmuekenheim, put all lines in any one line.
>
>
>

>> But |N is not more than all its finite initial segments.
>
> Yes it is, as it is not merely a list of all its FISONs but the union of
> all of them, which is not the same thing, except possibly in the wilds
> of Wolkenmuekenheim, .

>>
>> Otherwise there must exist at least two finite initial segments such
>> that
>> exist j, k, m, n : m e s_j & ~(m e s_k) & ~(n e s_j) & n e s_k.

>
> Certainly not outside his Wolkenmuekenheim. While WM keeps claiming itt,
> he has yet to proffer any evidence for it, much less any proof of it.
>
> Thus if it is to hold at all, it can only hold where WM's word is law
> and his claims do not need proofs: inside Wolkenmuekenheim,


so Wolkenmuekenheim is a Set,
inside exists a collection of subsets of ideas
outside the Wolkenmuekenheim Set, the rest of the world

if no proof exists, then spoof exists -





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.