Virgil
Posts:
8,833
Registered:
1/6/11


Re: WMytheology again
Posted:
May 2, 2013 4:19 PM


In article <a6135683920043e092fd7d0b8321a961@m4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de> wrote:
> On 2 Mai, 07:32, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > > by construction, every finite initial segment s_n = {1, 2, 3, ..., n} > > > > > is in one single line, all finite initial segments are in one single > > > > > line. But N is not more than all its finite initial segments. > > > > It is the union of all those finite lines, FISONs, and while each line > > has a largest natural in it the list of all lines does not nor does the > > union of all lines in that list. > > The list has no last line. Each line is a union. So there is no last > union.
If there are all lines in your list, then there is a union of all those lines. If there are not all lines in your list, your list has left some lines out.
> So there are infinitely many unions.
Only one of those uions is relavant, the union of all lines.
> So it is useless to union > all lines of the list in order to obtain something that has not been > in an infinity of unions before. Since none of those prior unions has been a union of ALL lines, such a union of ALL lines gives more than what any of them.
Ay least when not incarcerated in the prison of Wolkenmuekenheim. 

