The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 259
Replies: 9   Last Post: May 2, 2013 4:46 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: WMytheology again
Posted: May 2, 2013 4:19 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article
WM <> wrote:

> On 2 Mai, 07:32, Virgil <> wrote:

> > > by construction, every finite initial segment s_n = {1, 2, 3, ..., n}
> >
> > > is in one single line, all finite initial segments are in one single
> >
> > > line. But |N is not more than all its finite initial segments.
> >
> > It is the union of all those finite lines, FISONs, and while each line
> > has a largest natural in it the list of all lines does not nor does the
> > union of all lines in that list.

> The list has no last line. Each line is a union. So there is no last
> union.

If there are all lines in your list, then there is a union of all those
If there are not all lines in your list, your list has left some lines

> So there are infinitely many unions.

Only one of those uions is relavant, the union of all lines.

> So it is useless to union
> all lines of the list in order to obtain something that has not been
> in an infinity of unions before.

Since none of those prior unions has been a union of ALL lines, such a
union of ALL lines gives more than what any of them.

Ay least when not incarcerated in the prison of Wolkenmuekenheim.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.