Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 259
Replies: 9   Last Post: May 2, 2013 4:46 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Virgil Posts: 8,833 Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 259
Posted: May 2, 2013 4:46 PM

In article <klu8g2\$gpt\$1@news.albasani.net>,
"AMiews" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:

> "Virgil" <virgil@ligriv.com> wrote in message
> news:virgil-CC3CDD.13433101052013@BIGNEWS.USENETMONSTER.COM...

> > In article
> > WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> >

> >> Matheology § 259
> >>
> >> A discussion in sci.logic yielded the following remarkable results
> >> with respect to a list having infinitely many lines
> >> {1}
> >> {1} U {2}
> >> {1} U {2} U {3}
> >> ...
> >> Each line contains as many unioned sets as its line number indicates
> >> but does not contain a line |N, since each line has a finite last
> >> number n.
> >>
> >> On the other hand, there are infinitely many lines and, as each line
> >> adds one number, there are infinitely many numbers in the list. Since,
> >> by construction, every finite initial segment s_n = {1, 2, 3, ..., n}
> >> is in one single line, all finite initial segments are in one single
> >> line.

> >
> > While each FISON fills in one single line, that does not put any two
> > FISONs on the same line, and certainly does not, at least outside
> > Wolkenmuekenheim, put all lines in any one line.
> >
> >
> >

> >> But |N is not more than all its finite initial segments.
> >
> > Yes it is, as it is not merely a list of all its FISONs but the union of
> > all of them, which is not the same thing, except possibly in the wilds
> > of Wolkenmuekenheim, .

> >>
> >> Otherwise there must exist at least two finite initial segments such
> >> that
> >> exist j, k, m, n : m e s_j & ~(m e s_k) & ~(n e s_j) & n e s_k.

> >
> > Certainly not outside his Wolkenmuekenheim. While WM keeps claiming itt,
> > he has yet to proffer any evidence for it, much less any proof of it.
> >
> > Thus if it is to hold at all, it can only hold where WM's word is law
> > and his claims do not need proofs: inside Wolkenmuekenheim,

>
> so Wolkenmuekenheim is a Set,
> inside exists a collection of subsets of ideas
> outside the Wolkenmuekenheim Set, the rest of the world
>
> if no proof exists, then spoof exists -

What WM presents as if they were proofs are certainly much more like
spoofs.
--

Date Subject Author
5/1/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
5/1/13 Virgil
5/1/13 Scott Berg
5/2/13 Virgil
5/2/13 Virgil
5/2/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
5/2/13 Virgil
5/2/13 Virgil