Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: WMYtheology � 258
Replies: 2   Last Post: May 2, 2013 5:54 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View  
Virgil

Posts: 6,993
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: WMYtheology � 258
Posted: May 2, 2013 5:54 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article
<2813e616-3720-4f49-a9c4-be76688e212d@o9g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:


> But in your Binary Tree the union of paths is an element of the set of
> all paths, namely an infinite path.


The union of two or more paths, being sets of nodes, is not an element
of the set of all paths, since it cannot be a path at all.

The union of two different paths must necessarily contain BOTH child
nodes of the last parent node they have in common, but a path can never
do that.

So WM messes up again!
--





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.