
Re: Bullphitting
Posted:
May 3, 2013 10:57 AM


On Fri, 03 May 2013 09:17:55 +0100, Robin Chapman <R.J.Chapman@ex.ac.uk> wrote:
>On 03/05/2013 03:17, 1treePetrifiedForestLane wrote: >> the formula, compared to the heuristical value >> of Brun's constant, is more than adequate; > >Does that mean true, or not? > >> I have simply been putting it as, >> "Brun's constant is not transcendental; >> assume that it is & derive a contradiction." > >But you steadfastly refuse to provide any details >or any reference .... Are you sure you didn't >dream it?
I don't know what you're going on about here. Brun's constant is obviously rational, being the sum of rationals. Maybe you're stuck on showing that a rational number cannot be transcendental? I don't recall exactly how that's proved...
Heh.

