In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 3 Mai, 23:21, Dan <dan.ms.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The refutation is that this: By definition all natural indices are > > > covered with digits 1 in the list above. And more than all is not > > > possible. > > > > Of course . The list uses all natural indices . But there are a lot of > > real numbers that don't correspond to those indices : > > 0.2 > > 1/9 = 0.111111..... > > and so on. > > Finite expressions like 1/9 or "0.111111....." cannot occur in the > course of a Cantor-argument.
Maybe not in a WM arguments, but Cantor arguements, like the rest of real mathematics, are far more catholic than WMytheology is. > > > You can 'cover' the natural numbers with real numbers . You can't do > > the reverse . --