In article <email@example.com>, Dan <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On May 4, 12:39 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > On 4 Mai, 10:21, Dan <dan.ms.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Finite expressions like 1/9 or "0.111111....." cannot occur in the > > > > course of a Cantor-argument. > > > > > It's a referent to an infinite expression. > > > > Of course, but Cantor's anti-diagonals are no referents but infinte > > expressions. > > > > > > > > > > 0.1 > > > > 0.11 > > > > 0.111 > > > > ... > > > > > Your list is as finite as "0.111111 ..." . > > > > That what I have written is finite. It stands for an infinite list. > > > If your finite writing > > 0.1 > 0.11 > 0.111 > ... > > stands for an infinite list > then my finite digit enumeration > 0.11111 ..... > stands for infinite digits . Thus disproving your list . > > Either they're both relevant to Cantor's argument, or they're both > irrelevant . HYPOCRITE .
WM using the same argument in support of his own position that he rejects in other's positions is the height of hypocrisy.