In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 6 Mai, 17:31, Dan <dan.ms.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The list is of non-terminating decimals (actual real numbers) . > > Their indices are natural numbers. > The indices of the digits 1 are finite initial sequences of real > numbers. > Do you agree?
With such nonsense? Never! > > > What you need isn't what the argument is . The fact that the > > asymmetry is blatant could be made evident to a fifth grader . > > The fact that both, reals and naturals, are in the list and can be > used according to my taste should be obvious to such a grader too.
Except that WM's "Taste" only runs to misuse of them.
Or > do you think that only men of genious can recognize that principle?
It would take more than genius to find any prnciple in that. > > > And , for one > > who knows to walk them properly, it's those bridges that lead to
The levels of mathematics that WM can never reach. --