In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 7 Mai, 00:14, Dan <dan.ms.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 0.11111...... > > should also be a valid real number . > > Infinite digits ,corresponding to an infinite row, are as valid as > > infinite digits of the columns . > > 0.11111...... it is not in the list > > 0.1 > 0.11 > 0.111 > ...
But, just like |N is the limit of the sequence of FISONs, it is the limit of your sequence. > > Or do you find it there?
Anyone but WM is capable of finding so obvious a limit. > > > > > the idea that (even if you do not accept that reals and integers are > > > in one and the same argument) the following list should not satisfy > > > your symmetry expectations, should it? > > > > 1 > > 2,1 > > 3,2,1 > > . . . . > > . . . . > > you didn't even write your own example correctly > > I did not intend that.
You have written exactly than many times. But having been shown how it destroys your own position, you now try to distance yourself from it. --