Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Topic: Based on the quadrilateral tree
Replies: 14   Last Post: May 8, 2013 7:00 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Joe Niederberger

Posts: 2,816
Registered: 10/12/08
Re: Based on the quadrilateral tree
Posted: May 7, 2013 6:57 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Its not even *just* a matter a definitions, this one seems pretty much a matter of mere labels with little further impact.

On the other hand, we see via:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.999...
Timothy Gowers argues that even the meaning of .999... is at bottom a matter "of convention" -- "However, it is by no means an arbitrary convention, because not adopting it forces one either to invent strange new objects or to abandon some of the familiar rules of arithmetic."

I happen to agree with Gowers, but also see a pretty big gulf between the two cases, as well as with the "unit square" convention I mentioned earlier.

To me, the upshot, for education, is that these sorts of matters (definitions, mere labels, definitions depending on other definitions, etc.) ought to be understood by those teaching, but apparently, that's not universally the case.

Cheers,
Joe N



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.