Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology � 258
Replies: 53   Last Post: May 11, 2013 10:07 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de Posts: 18,076 Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 258
Posted: May 8, 2013 3:11 PM

On 8 Mai, 20:05, YBM <ybm...@nooos.fr.invalid> wrote:
> Le 08.05.2013 11:01, WM a crit :
>
>
>
>
>

> > On 7 Mai, 23:18, Ralf Bader <ba...@nefkom.net> wrote:
> >> WM wrote:
> >>> On 7 Mai, 22:35, Ralf Bader <ba...@nefkom.net> wrote:
>
> >>>> Obvious is your stupidity.-
>
> >>> You have an uncontrollable interest in mathematical discussions,
> >>> haven't you?

>
> >> I have an interest in the phenomena of stupidity. You seem to believe that
> >> a "mathematical discussion" goes like this:

>
> >> /begin
> >> 0.11111...... it is not in the list

>
> >> 0.1
> >> 0.11
> >> 0.111
> >> ...

>
> >> Or do you find it there?
> >> /end.

>
> >> But this is not a mathematical discussion.
>
> > That is really a tragedy: an uncontrollable interest in mathematical
> > discussions combined with the inability to understand.

>
> Very nice abstract of you whole life, WM.-

No discussion with anti-mathematicians who accept different limits for

For all n: f(n) = 1 , lim_n-->oo f(n) = 1
This is required for correctly calculating differential quotients in
analysis. (Just this morning I explained that in class.)
For all n: f(n) = 1 , lim_n-->oo f(n) = 0
This is required for "proving" countability in set theory. (Next days
I will show what nonsense that is.)

Regards, WM