In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 9 Mai, 22:38, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > Your sequential arguments are like using sledgehammers to crack > > eggs. > > Using microscopes instead of spectacles would be a better analogy. > > > > > > Is that too difficult for your students, or just too difficult for you? > > Of course I teach both methods, the more usual and that with > sequences. But if the latter would or could fail, from time to time, > we had a contradiction in mathematics.
> Currently we have only a > contradiction between mathematics and matheology. That is not > disturbing.
But everyone outside of Wolkenmuekenheim finds that it is WMytheology that is in contradiction to mathematics, and ther is only onwe person, WM, inside it.
And that is more amusing than amusing, other that the crime of allowing WM to corrupt students. --