On May 9, 2013, rich...@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) wrote: > In article <15f8c357-4e38-42a6-aed6-0b92d83a2...@e14g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, > Soap Research <soap.resea...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >> > Knowing tha IJAMR is a peer-reviewed journal, > >> How do you know that? > >Have a look at this : > >http://www.sciencepubco.com/index.php/ijamr/about/editorialPolicies#p... > > >You'll have your answer. > > That's just a claim by the publisher. Remember we have also have the > evidence that your paper was published. > > -- Richard
My paper? Please don't associate me with that piece of sh... I'm not related to these wackos in any way.
You're probably right about the publisher. If the referee has no clue about what he reads, he may be tempted to accept it just to get the 100 erros.