On 10/05/2013 12:47, Soap Research wrote: > On May 9, 2013, rich...@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) wrote: >> In article <15f8c357-4e38-42a6-aed6-0b92d83a2...@e14g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, >> Soap Research <soap.resea...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>>>> Knowing tha IJAMR is a peer-reviewed journal, >>>> How do you know that? >>> Have a look at this : >>> http://www.sciencepubco.com/index.php/ijamr/about/editorialPolicies#p... >> >>> You'll have your answer. >> >> That's just a claim by the publisher. Remember we have also have the >> evidence that your paper was published. >> >> -- Richard > > My paper? Please don't associate me with that piece of sh... I'm not > related to these wackos in any way. > > You're probably right about the publisher. If the referee has no clue > about what he reads, he may be tempted to accept it just to get the > 100 erros.
Are there referees?
I must confess I am totally sceptical about this journal's "refereeing policy", but on the other hand I am completely credulous regarding its article charges --- I believed instantly it really did charge 100 euros per paper :-)