The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: electron phase change into a positron Chapt15.63 electrons of Helium
seeking to be a photon structure #1357 New Physics #1561 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Replies: 1   Last Post: May 10, 2013 1:06 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 18,572
Registered: 3/31/08
electron phase change into a positron Chapt15.63 electrons of Helium
seeking to be a photon structure #1357 New Physics #1561 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Posted: May 10, 2013 12:40 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Alright in my last several posts I indicated the two electrons sharing
a suborbital such as in helium of 1s2 or of neon of 2p6 that the two
electrons look like this as a combination of matter tranverse wave
with longitudinal magnetic wave

2M+ 2M-

Now that picture is very much similar to a photon as this:

M+ M-

where the E field and M fields destructive interference allowing the
speed of light to be a constant regardless of frequency or wavelength.

In chemistry we all know that elements on both sides of the inert
gases want to be like the inert gases in electron structure and so
they chemically bond with other atoms to achieve this inert gas
electron structure.

What I am about to raise the issue upon, is that electrons inside of
atoms want to be like the photon structure of a cross section of wave
with 4 poles of 2 E field and 2 magnetic monopole field.

So now, in Hund's Rule we have each single electron wanting to be
single and isolated but having the same alignment as neighboring
electrons of an up spin alignment and wanting to be single in a
suborbital, until it is time to go to a higher subshell, then the
electrons would rather fill up each lower subshell orbital with a pair
of electrons.

So as single electrons they are this:

M+ M-

but as paired up electrons in suborbitals they are this:

2M+ 2M-

So they are almost approaching the structure of a photon

M+ M-

Now, do we have any physics experiments or observations that those two
structures are the truth?

Well, yes of course we have Pair Production and Pair Annihilation of
electrons and photons. In Pair Production we have a gamma ray photon
that splits into two particles of a electron and positron of this:

M+ M-


M+ M-

So, this leads me to question whether the second electron that pairs
with the first electron in a suborbital, whether it is in fact a
normal electron converted into being a positron? If it is, then I have
a perfect symmetry of electrons being transformed into a photon in
suborbitals such as the two helium electrons. So that the two
electrons of helium are the same as a energetic photon.

In this sense, for the first time in physics and chemistry, we have a
unification of photons and electrons and not just that they pair
produce one another but that photons and electrons are the same thing
in particular circumstances. In Old Physics, we had the false notion
that the electron and positron and photon were independently existing
and different particles. In New Physics we have the view that these
three are the very same single particle with a phase change, such as
ice is water is water vapor. The electron is a positron is a photon as
different phases of the particle. And when an electron is forced to
share a suborbital, it phase changes into a positron.

Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem,,
sci.geo.geology,, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to?be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel?University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education?not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill.?Besides, Drexel's Math Forum can demand no fake
names, and only 5 posts per day, of all posters which reduces or
eliminates most spam and hate-spew, search-engine-bombing, and front-
page-hogging. Drexel has?done a excellent, simple and fair author-
archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012?as seen?here:

Archimedes Plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.