In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 10 Mai, 03:59, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > > > > I do not know if I am "right" or "wrong". > > Every assumption of finished infinity, unnameable names, unnumerable > numbers, and unthinkable thoughts is wrong.
But only so in Wolkenmuekenheim.
At least one infinite set is necessary for both the proper definition of and proper execution of induction.
The standard definition of the real number system, for which WM has no acceptable substitute requires the existence of more numbers than names so there have to be some unnameable numbers, but only in the weirdness of Wolkenmuekenheim can there be anything like "unnumberable numbers".
And if something has been thought of by anyone outside of Wolkenmuekenheim, it is certainly thinkable, even though WM's thinker is far too handicapped to manage it. --