Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology � 261
Replies: 11   Last Post: May 16, 2013 8:42 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Virgil

Posts: 9,012
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 261
Posted: May 14, 2013 3:16 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article
<2910c29a-42ce-4273-893a-8a16e2878804@w15g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 12 Mai, 23:03, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>

> > > > The process by which you get any line is not independent of the prior
> > > > lines having at one time been in existence, so all those prior lines
> > > > once existed

> >
> > > But there is no difference for a line whether or not the preceding
> > > lines continue to exist.

> >
> > Once it has come into existence, its continued existence may not be
> > needed, but if it never had existed, neither could its successors.
> >
> > In a sane world the existence of 2 requires a prior existence of 1, and
> > existence of any natural n + 1 requires a prior existence of n.

>
> So 3 + 4 is 16 because the predecessors of 3 and 4 claim their right?


Only when constrained to the rujes of WMytheology in Wolkenmuekenheim!

Elsewhere, at least in WM-free decimal addition, 3 + 4 = 7.
--





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.