Virgil
Posts:
8,833
Registered:
1/6/11


Re: Matheology � 261
Posted:
May 14, 2013 3:16 PM


In article <2910c29a42ce4273893a8a16e2878804@w15g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de> wrote:
> On 12 Mai, 23:03, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > > > The process by which you get any line is not independent of the prior > > > > lines having at one time been in existence, so all those prior lines > > > > once existed > > > > > But there is no difference for a line whether or not the preceding > > > lines continue to exist. > > > > Once it has come into existence, its continued existence may not be > > needed, but if it never had existed, neither could its successors. > > > > In a sane world the existence of 2 requires a prior existence of 1, and > > existence of any natural n + 1 requires a prior existence of n. > > So 3 + 4 is 16 because the predecessors of 3 and 4 claim their right?
Only when constrained to the rujes of WMytheology in Wolkenmuekenheim!
Elsewhere, at least in WMfree decimal addition, 3 + 4 = 7. 

