Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology � 261
Replies: 11   Last Post: May 16, 2013 8:42 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Virgil Posts: 8,833 Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 261
Posted: May 14, 2013 3:16 PM

In article
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 12 Mai, 23:03, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>

> > > > The process by which you get any line is not independent of the prior
> > > > lines having at one time been in existence, so all those prior lines
> > > > once existed

> >
> > > But there is no difference for a line whether or not the preceding
> > > lines continue to exist.

> >
> > Once it has come into existence, its continued existence may not be
> > needed, but if it never had existed, neither could its successors.
> >
> > In a sane world the existence of 2 requires a prior existence of 1, and
> > existence of any natural n + 1 requires a prior existence of n.

>
> So 3 + 4 is 16 because the predecessors of 3 and 4 claim their right?

Only when constrained to the rujes of WMytheology in Wolkenmuekenheim!

Elsewhere, at least in WM-free decimal addition, 3 + 4 = 7.
--

Date Subject Author
5/11/13 Virgil
5/12/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
5/12/13 Virgil
5/12/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
5/12/13 Virgil
5/14/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
5/14/13 Virgil
5/15/13 Scott Berg
5/15/13 fom
5/16/13 Scott Berg