Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology � 263
Replies: 57   Last Post: May 17, 2013 8:52 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Virgil

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 263
Posted: May 15, 2013 11:10 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article
<027323ca-c76e-4a38-9fe3-05a7e9f97f8c@j2g2000pbx.googlegroups.com>,
Graham Cooper <grahamcooper7@gmail.com> wrote:

> On May 16, 10:32 am, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <237329e6-bd08-4bdf-94ce-c6eb87af6...@oy6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,
> >  Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >

> > > On May 15, 6:14 pm, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > <0982dd8e-550d-4f48-a918-b9b7b3c00...@oy9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,
> > > >  Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >
> > > > > On May 15, 12:21 pm, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > > > > In article
> >
> > > > > > > GIVEN A LIST OF SUBSETS OF N
> >
> > > > > > > you admit you cannot calculate ANY members of a supposed missing
> > > > > > > set.

> >
> > > > Not without the complete list.
> >
> > > > > > > f(1) = { 1 , 3 , 6 }
> > > > > > > f(2) = { 1 , 5 , 11 }
> > > > > > > f(3) = { 2 , 4 , 6, 8 , 10 , ... }
> > > > > > > f(4) = { 4 , 5, 6, 7, 8 }

> >
> > > > > > > IS 2 e MISSINGSET ?
> >
> > > > > > > Last time asking.
> >
> > > > > > Yes! As previously answered 2 is a member of at least one such
> > > > > > missing
> > > > > > set. And so is 3, of at least for one such missing set.
> > > > > > But there are more sets missing than not missing and 2 need not be
> > > > > > missing from every one of those "missing sets".

> >
> > > > > So Missing Set = { ......... } ????
> >
> > > > No missing set can be identified without first having the list of all
> > > > the sets which are not missing.

> >
> > > You can't calculate any members at all of any missing set ?
> >
> > There is no natural which is necessarily a member of every missing set
> > so until you tell me a lot more about which naturals are or not in your
> > missing set, I cannot tell you anything about which naturals are or not
> > in your missing set.
> >

>
> How many missing sets have you specified?


I haven't specified any of them. they get specified by anyone trying to
list all subsets of |N, as being the ones that aren't listed when he/she
is done.
--




Date Subject Author
5/10/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/13/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/13/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/13/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/13/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/13/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/14/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/14/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/14/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/14/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/14/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/14/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/14/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/14/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/14/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/14/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/15/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/15/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/15/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/15/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/15/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/15/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/15/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Scott Berg
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/16/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/17/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/17/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/17/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/17/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/17/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/17/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/17/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil
5/17/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/14/13
Read Re: Matheology § 263
Graham Cooper
5/14/13
Read Re: Matheology � 263
Virgil

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.