The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Chapt15.65 Unification of 4 Particles of Physics by the Maxwell
Equations #1373 New Physics #1580 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Replies: 1   Last Post: May 16, 2013 12:37 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 18,572
Registered: 3/31/08
AP-diagrams Re: Chapt15.65 Unification of 4 Particles of Physics by
the Maxwell Equations #1374 New Physics #1581 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Posted: May 16, 2013 12:37 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Now I need to get really aggressive here, for a near full
understanding of how two electrons in a suborbital of Hund's Rule
becomes a gamma ray photon with perpetual motion.

Now in Chemistry there is a aid to understanding called the Lewis dot
diagram of chemical bonding. If you take chemistry in school, I am
sure you will run across Lewis diagrams. And I discovered a diagram
method for particles of physics when I discovered the photon has to be
a double transverse wave. Old Physics had the photon as this diagram:


shaped like a reverse "L" where the electric field E
is one pole and the magnetic field B is the 2nd pole of a single
transverse wave.

I depict the photon as this in a double transverse wave with 4 poles:

M+ M-

But even that is inadequate to depict the photon and the neutrino and
two electrons where one is converted to a positron and the two
combining to form a gamma ray photon.

So I need more magnetic monopoles. Dirac computed that the "size" of
the magnetic monopole would be 137/2 (e) where "e" is the electric
charge. And I think Dirac made a mistake, in that it should be
the reverse where 137/2 magnetic monopoles is equivalent to the
electric charge. So that the photon would then be depicted in a AP-
diagram as this:

(137/2)M+ (137/2)M-

Now I need these AP-diagrams and I need the Hund's Rule and of course,
all has to come from the Maxwell Equations.

So the prime base electron looks like this:


(shaped like a reverse letter L and is a single transverse wave) And
the proton and positron would switch the signs of positive and
negative. And these diagrams do not include mass.

So the neutrino is going to be a particle of only magnetic monopoles
such as this:

2M+ 2M-

or this:

137M+ 137M-

Now the most important Maxwell Equation law for this is the Faraday
law with magnetic monopoles for it describes the electron as a closed
loop wire (a hole in Space as Hyperbolic geometry) and describes the
positron as a bar magnet of Faraday law as a "ball in Space" as
Elliptic geometry. So that in the Hund's rule as two electrons, one
converted to a positron in a suborbital turns the two particles into a
gamma ray photon. So we have a closed loop wire, the electron and a
positron as the bar magnet thrust through the closed loop wire, which
makes the 2 electrons revolve in perpetual motion around the nucleus
of the atom.

So, what I need to show from the AP diagrams is how a electron as


and the second electron:


How one of them is mediated by a neutrino so that the one electron
changes its signs to be opposite. Then the two combine to form a gamma
ray photon of this:

(137/2)M+ (137/2)M-

So, what Maxwell Equation mechanism is there for a neutrino to come
along and reverse the signs of an electron?

Well, I think it is in the Faraday law also, that as you put the bar
magnet fully inside the copper coil and then pull the bar magnet out
of the coil that the electromotive force reverses. So what this
implies is that the Hund's rule of a filled suborbital of two
electrons where one converts to a positron and the two combine to be a
gamma ray photon is simply the pure Faraday force law itself in


More than 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem,,
sci.geo.geology,, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to?be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel?University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education?not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill.?Besides, Drexel's Math Forum can demand no fake
names, and only 5 posts per day of all posters which reduces or
eliminates most spam and hate-spew, search-engine-bombing, and front-
page-hogging. Drexel has?done a excellent, simple and fair author-
archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012?as seen?here:

Archimedes Plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.