Now I need to get really aggressive here, for a near full understanding of how two electrons in a suborbital of Hund's Rule becomes a gamma ray photon with perpetual motion.
Now in Chemistry there is a aid to understanding called the Lewis dot diagram of chemical bonding. If you take chemistry in school, I am sure you will run across Lewis diagrams. And I discovered a diagram method for particles of physics when I discovered the photon has to be a double transverse wave. Old Physics had the photon as this diagram:
shaped like a reverse "L" where the electric field E is one pole and the magnetic field B is the 2nd pole of a single transverse wave.
I depict the photon as this in a double transverse wave with 4 poles:
E- M+ M- E+
But even that is inadequate to depict the photon and the neutrino and two electrons where one is converted to a positron and the two combining to form a gamma ray photon.
So I need more magnetic monopoles. Dirac computed that the "size" of the magnetic monopole would be 137/2 (e) where "e" is the electric charge. And I think Dirac made a mistake, in that it should be the reverse where 137/2 magnetic monopoles is equivalent to the electric charge. So that the photon would then be depicted in a AP- diagram as this:
E- (137/2)M+ (137/2)M- E+
Now I need these AP-diagrams and I need the Hund's Rule and of course, all has to come from the Maxwell Equations.
So the prime base electron looks like this:
(shaped like a reverse letter L and is a single transverse wave) And the proton and positron would switch the signs of positive and negative. And these diagrams do not include mass.
So the neutrino is going to be a particle of only magnetic monopoles such as this:
Now the most important Maxwell Equation law for this is the Faraday law with magnetic monopoles for it describes the electron as a closed loop wire (a hole in Space as Hyperbolic geometry) and describes the positron as a bar magnet of Faraday law as a "ball in Space" as Elliptic geometry. So that in the Hund's rule as two electrons, one converted to a positron in a suborbital turns the two particles into a gamma ray photon. So we have a closed loop wire, the electron and a positron as the bar magnet thrust through the closed loop wire, which makes the 2 electrons revolve in perpetual motion around the nucleus of the atom.
So, what I need to show from the AP diagrams is how a electron as this:
and the second electron:
How one of them is mediated by a neutrino so that the one electron changes its signs to be opposite. Then the two combine to form a gamma ray photon of this:
E- (137/2)M+ (137/2)M- E+
So, what Maxwell Equation mechanism is there for a neutrino to come along and reverse the signs of an electron?
Well, I think it is in the Faraday law also, that as you put the bar magnet fully inside the copper coil and then pull the bar magnet out of the coil that the electromotive force reverses. So what this implies is that the Hund's rule of a filled suborbital of two electrons where one converts to a positron and the two combine to be a gamma ray photon is simply the pure Faraday force law itself in action.
More than 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio, sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro, sci.physics.electromag to?be hosted by a University the same as what Drexel?University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to be in education?not in the hands of corporations chasing after the next dollar bill.?Besides, Drexel's Math Forum can demand no fake names, and only 5 posts per day of all posters which reduces or eliminates most spam and hate-spew, search-engine-bombing, and front- page-hogging. Drexel has?done a excellent, simple and fair author- archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012?as seen?here: