
Re: Matheology § 263
Posted:
May 16, 2013 8:28 PM


On May 17, 10:23 am, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > In article > <2e280e674adf45b4a320330324f50...@ks18g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>, > Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On May 17, 10:00 am, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > In article > > > <9d1681d320a0439ebb2c379c6f0ea...@qz2g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>, > > > Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > USE the given f! > > > > You did not give any f. > > > Can you use Cantor's Definition of missing set > > > on a Finite (sub) example or not? > > No, as anyone with any sense should have been able to work out for > himself. > > In fact not even for an f undefined at only one argument, because any > such f's value may still be defined at any one of the many still missing > sets, which will then no longer be a missing set. > > So one cannot tell which sets are not going to be used until one knows > which sets which will be used. > >
Why did you say 2 & 3 were in S?
Herc

