Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology � 263
Replies: 57   Last Post: May 17, 2013 8:52 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Virgil Posts: 8,833 Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 263
Posted: May 16, 2013 8:35 PM

In article
Graham Cooper <grahamcooper7@gmail.com> wrote:

> On May 17, 10:23 am, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > In article
> >  Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >

> > > On May 17, 10:00 am, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > <9d1681d3-20a0-439e-bb2c-379c6f0ea...@qz2g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,
> > > > Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >
> > > > > USE the given f!
> >
> > > > You did not give any f.
> >
> > > Can you use Cantor's Definition of missing set
> >
> > > on a Finite (sub) example or not?
> >
> > No, as anyone with any sense should have been able to work out for
> > himself.
> >
> > In fact not even for an f undefined at only one argument, because any
> > such f's value may still be defined at any one of the many still missing
> > sets, which will then no longer be a missing set.
> >
> > So one cannot tell which sets are not going to be used until one knows
> > which sets which will be used.
> >
> >

>
> Why did you say 2 & 3 were in S?

I did not say that! I said that for the particular partial function you
gave they would have been in at least one such S but I also noted that
there could be many other S's in which neither need appear.

Do you ever bother to read what I post before making a fool of yourself
by misinterpreting it?
--

Date Subject Author
5/10/13 Virgil
5/13/13 Virgil
5/13/13 Graham Cooper
5/13/13 Virgil
5/13/13 Graham Cooper
5/13/13 Virgil
5/14/13 Graham Cooper
5/14/13 Virgil
5/14/13 Graham Cooper
5/14/13 Virgil
5/14/13 Graham Cooper
5/14/13 Virgil
5/14/13 Graham Cooper
5/14/13 Virgil
5/14/13 Graham Cooper
5/14/13 Virgil
5/15/13 Graham Cooper
5/15/13 Virgil
5/15/13 Graham Cooper
5/15/13 Virgil
5/15/13 Graham Cooper
5/15/13 Virgil
5/15/13 Graham Cooper
5/16/13 Virgil
5/16/13 Graham Cooper
5/16/13 Virgil
5/16/13 Graham Cooper
5/16/13 Virgil
5/16/13 Graham Cooper
5/16/13 Virgil
5/16/13 Graham Cooper
5/16/13 Virgil
5/16/13 Graham Cooper
5/16/13 Virgil
5/16/13 Graham Cooper
5/16/13 Virgil
5/16/13 Graham Cooper
5/16/13 Scott Berg
5/16/13 Virgil
5/16/13 Graham Cooper
5/16/13 Virgil
5/16/13 Graham Cooper
5/16/13 Virgil
5/16/13 Virgil
5/16/13 Graham Cooper
5/17/13 Virgil
5/17/13 Graham Cooper
5/17/13 Virgil
5/17/13 Graham Cooper
5/17/13 Virgil
5/17/13 Graham Cooper
5/17/13 Virgil
5/17/13 Graham Cooper
5/14/13 Graham Cooper
5/14/13 Virgil