If I understand this proposal aa), then I completely disagree. It is *essential* to have the ability to use a function Chop that, e.g., does the following:
Chop[4. + 10.^-16 I] 4.
The reason is that even when one starts with strictly real functions, it is often the case that Mathematica uses complex-function methods and, due to roundoff, returns results with some pure imaginary "fuzz".
On May 16, 2013, at 3:28 AM, Peter Klamser <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> . .. A) First proposal: Identify useless or false constructions in Mathematica > > aa) Eliminating Chop for complex numbers. Complex numbers are > oderless and therefore nobody call estimate, weather the distance of 1 > + 10^-google i to the real numbers is small or big. Chop is the > result of Mathematica design, that it presents often complex results, where > real values are the simpler result and can be reached by > ComplexExpand. > The simplest solution is always the best solution.
--- Murray Eisenberg email@example.com Mathematics & Statistics Dept. Lederle Graduate Research Tower phone 413 549-1020 (H) University of Massachusetts 413 545-2838 (W) 710 North Pleasant Street fax 413 545-1801 Amherst, MA 01003-9305