
Re: Work on Basic Mathematica Stephen!
Posted:
May 17, 2013 4:34 AM


.... thank you for the response.
Every WRI employee writes this since years, but "fuzz" stays "fuzz" and "fuzz" is not essential.
Peter
2013/5/16 Murray Eisenberg <murray@math.umass.edu>: > If I understand this proposal aa), then I completely disagree. It is *essential* to have the ability to use a function Chop that, e.g., does the following: > > Chop[4. + 10.^16 I] > 4. > > The reason is that even when one starts with strictly real functions, it is often the case that Mathematica uses complexfunction methods and, due to roundoff, returns results with some pure imaginary "fuzz". > > On May 16, 2013, at 3:28 AM, Peter Klamser <klamser@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> . .. A) First proposal: Identify useless or false constructions in Mathematica >> >> aa) Eliminating Chop[] for complex numbers. Complex numbers are >> oderless and therefore nobody call estimate, weather the distance of 1 >> + 10^google i to the real numbers is small or big. Chop[] is the >> result of Mathematica design, that it presents often complex results, where >> real values are the simpler result and can be reached by >> ComplexExpand[]. >> The simplest solution is always the best solution. > >  > Murray Eisenberg murray@math.umass.edu > Mathematics & Statistics Dept. > Lederle Graduate Research Tower phone 413 5491020 (H) > University of Massachusetts 413 5452838 (W) > 710 North Pleasant Street fax 413 5451801 > Amherst, MA 010039305 > > > > >

