> Yes, every post you make errors regarding Cantor's formula. > > It's a real maze to get one sensible comment out of you. > > You infer all sorts of facts given the example f > then say nothing can be inferred at all from a partial f. > > Why would S change its value of 2eS > > given f(2) but not f(100) ?
Here's a game:
* you give me a way of determining the nth digit of the mth number in a list of reals given in decimal; * I give you back a way of determining the digits of a real in decimal; * you tell me where that number is in your given list -- you win if it is where you claim, and lose otherwise.